Friday, November 10, 2006
I just finished watching the Phoenix Suns game vs. the Dallas Mavericks.  They interviewed Jason Terry at the end of the game on TNT and he talked about how he was literally "on his knees praying" for Dallas to get their first win of the season which they finally got tonight.  At the end of the interview Jason talked about how the Arizona Wildcats Men's basketball team (his alma mater) would be #1 in the country by the end of the year!  It was fun to hear that.  Jason and I competed together against each other in college.  One time, in a game at U. of Arizona, (Back when I played college for Stanford) both Jason and I got hurt and needed stitches after the game.  We were both sitting in the training room for about two hours after the game and we really got to know each other.  I remember that my parents were at that game and a lot of Jason's family was there too.  So there were basically two families in the training room at 11pm at night and we've been friends ever since.  Jason is a class act who is really leading the Dallas Mavericks this season and last season.

We practiced today here at the Target Center in MN, and we are all upset with our slow start.  Today's workout session was very heated which is great because it shows how much all of the guys care about winning.  I think we are beginning to see the emergence of Randy Foye.  Randy Foye is one of the few players in the NBA who seems to be able to get to the Free throw line at will.  It helps because he is a 90% free throw shooter also.  Looking forward to seeing you guys at the Target Center soon!

Lastly, a few of the guys on our team have been frustrated with the fact that the NBA has given the refs a mandate to call technical fouls on a "zero tolerance" pollicy.  Because of this, great players are getting thrown out of games all around the league.  From Carmello, to Rasheed, to Mike Bibby, players in the NBA are getting tossed from arenas really fast.  I'm not in favor of berating officials under any circumstances, but players must be allowed to speak to refs in heated moments without fear of getting tossed.  I think in the end, the fans are getting the short end of the stick.  Fans come to games to be able to see passionate basketball played very hard.  Kevin Garnett is an emotional player; Rasheed Wallace is emotional; Sam Cassell is the most emotional player I've ever played with.  I really believe that fans enjoy the passion and emotion that these players have.  I know that when I'm around town here in Minneapolis, fans always talk about how much they love the emotion and passion of KG.....I think that the old system was pretty good.  When a player got out of hand he was ejected.  The new system is that if a player shows any sort of abrupt emotional/angry body language at a call he could be at risk to himself and his team.  But I'm not a fan paying for the seats........if any of you could give me feedback to pass on to the Union and eventually the NBA, please post in the comments section below what your honest thoughts are.  Do you want to see NBA players not to be able to react much after a bad call?  Or do you like it when the emotion is shown?  I do think that the NBA officials are the best in the world, but it would be nice if they had a little bit more leeway from their own set of rules so less technicals are called.

ON Wednesday we are meeting with Billy Hunter (He's with the Players Union) and I'm sure we will be talking about the issue of technical fouls.  We'll also be discussing the new nba ball and the slippery surface when wet.  One reader of this blog sent a link to a published physicist who did a study on the new NBA ball---A PHYSICST-----The physicist's findings were that the ball is more slippery than the old ball when wet---just what all of the NBA players have been saying for months!!!  I am going to contact this scientific authority and see if I can gain permission to use his published work on this blog for the purpose of dialogue.

Even LeBron James (early in the season he said he could play with any ball) came out publicly AGAINST the ball recently.   I mean when Shaq, Allen Iverson, Kevin Garnett, Steve Nash, leBron etc. voice concerns over the ball, there might be something to it.  We don't care if it's synthetic.  Just make it so that it's not so slippery when it gets wet.  I'm sure with today's technology this is possible. 

Ultimately, I think some sort of compromise will take place with both issues so that all sides involved will be happy.  If we do get to go back to leather as the NBA has indicated publicly is a possibility, we must ensure that the leather used is only from trusted sources that do not employ harsh or cruel treatment to the animals providing the leather.  In my opinion the only leather that should be used is leather from an approved list of ethical beef producing companies/entities.  Most of those would probably be domestic where stricter policies are in place.   It think this was one of PETA.org's concerns with the old ball and the use of international leather sources where bad treatment of animals is prevalent.  I think we should open a dialogue with PETA also to ensure that we get this right.  

Stay tuned for the article from the Physicist about the NBA ball.  I am going to contact him personally and hopefully link him up with the Player's Union so that we can get his feedback and article dissmenated throughout the NBA players so they can say "Yea, or Nay".  If we're lucky, I might be able to interview him in addition to publishing his scholarly piece here on this blog.  It would be interesting to hear what a real Physicist says about the new NBA ball who has already written a paper on it after exhaustive testing comparisions to the older ball. 

I feel like this has become part of my role as the player rep for my team.  Fans ask me about the new ball in differnet places.  One bagger in a grocery store was asking me all about it.  My neigbor and former President of my homeowner's association in Eden Prairie was asking me why the ball was changed in the first place at a Halloween Party.  ON a flight after a game last month, Kevin Garnett and Ricky Davis basically came up with the idea to contact all of the other player reps directly around the league to band together to get some momentum going to give the NBA feedback on the new synthetic ball.  Ricky kind of asked me to spearhead this.  Unfortunately with my knee injury I haven't gotten as much done as I should.  Hopefully we can begin this in the next few days after talking it over with Billy. 

I may get in touch with my alma Mater and see if the Stanford Econ Department has any undergrad or grad students willing to do a statistical analysis on turnovers, shooting percentages this season as compared to last season.  It would be a nice senior project for a thesis that would be passed on to other players.   Shaq felt that turnovers would go up and shooting percentages would go down.  Hey he might be right, he might be wrong......It would be interesting to quantify this mathematically and see if there is any sort of correlation or not.  Maybe Mark CUban has already done it.....have you done it yet Cube?  I actually suspect that shooting percentages might go up b/c the ball has a softer bounce.  BUt unfortunately I predict turnovers to go up due to the slick nature of the ball.  Steve Nash one of the best ballhandlers in the world had 10 turnovers tonight in the game.  I think fans like more scoring but I think they hate turnovers as much as my coach does!  The NBA always does things for a good reason and I do agree the new synthetic balls are more consistent across the entire league when they are new so that is a positive.

11/10/2006 1:42:10 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)  #    Comments [12]
11/10/2006 2:06:46 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Mr. Madsen,
I have a Pistons Blog called Need4Sheed.com, and I recently started a petition to send to Mr. Stern about the new rule and its flaws. Although I understand the need for the technical foul, I believe the new rule is being executed unfairly. So I am out to save Sheed and all the other teams and players that will surely be affected by this rule that seems to be inconsistent and is interpreted differently each game.

I have had the petition up for just a few days and already have well over 1600 signatures. It’s a heated topic and many fans feel as if this is their chance to speak out on it.

I just thought you would be interested in what I am trying to do.

http://www.need4sheed.com/2006/11/save-sheed-and-nba-petition.html


Good luck with your season, and keep up the blog!
11/10/2006 2:38:41 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Hey Mark, I can't make an intelligent coment on the ball, but I would be willing to donate my own skin to make a ball if it would help the Timberwolves back to their winning ways ;-)

As for the technical foul calls for any arguing at all, I completely agree with you! The last thing I want to see is adult men being told they need to be *less* emotional. I mean, I don't want to see guys being abusive, but refs should be strong and confident enough to entertain a little objection, right? I have to hear it at my job when I mess up.

Hope your knee is on the mend. You gotta get back under the basket!
11/10/2006 4:16:54 AM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Hi Mark,

This issue about reacting and so on has also been an issue in other sports like soccer here in Europe. The thing is that players in the NBA are well-know also with the kids in my team that I am the coach of. Those kids are 8,9 or 10 years old and we tell them that we don't want them to argue with the refs. The ref is right even if he isn't but then it is our job to argue with him and not the kid's. So in some way if they see NBA players (they look up to them) do that they try to do that too and that is very bad behaviour on that ages. When they grow older it becomes different, they can react but still have to be respectfull. But they do pick up things from their idols, so in that way it is good if the refs are more strickt now, but they will probably ease up as soon that the new rules have settled in for a while. That always happens.

Get your knee right soon and hope they will broadcast a game of the timberwolves soon here
siska
11/10/2006 2:32:56 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Hello Mark-

Great job on the blog and the work you do with the union. I think it is an important job you do off the court and the league could use more "stand up guys" such as yourself.

As far as this arguement that "the emotion is being taken out of the game" I have to disagree. There is an enormous difference between being emotional and being down right disrespectful. When a player shows emotion for the GAME on the court, we the fans reciprocate in full. I enjoy nothing more than watching an athlete pour their heart out on the court. However, when professional athletes (who are being paid more in one week than most Americans make in a year)act as if they are "above the law", it alienates the fans. Perhaps even worse, they are setting an example for the following generations that these actions are ok and even appropriate. And we all know that the children are the future. As a paying customer, we don't come to games to watch these highly skilled athletes throwing there hands up, or putting a screw face on, or, even more appaling, attempting to bully the ref any time they believe the wrong call was made. We come to watch them play and play hard.

It is my belief that these actions speak to a much deeper problem. Professional athletes, in all countries, seem to have entitlement issues. They have been coddled and held in higher regard than they probably should be their entire lives and very few seem to ever grow up. On top of this, it shows a lack of humility. Everyone is wrong sometimes, but in the eyes of some NBA players, they have never committed a foul in their entire playing careers (Sam Cassell and Sheed, I'm looking at you). I'm not trying to say the ref is right ALL the time, but once the whistle has blown, move on and adjust. I have never seen a call reversed because of a player arguing. I hope the refs continue to enforce the rule, even if it means that some big names aren't around for the end of the game.

While a pro athlete should have the right to their own private life off their field of choice, when they are competeing on it, they should be held accountable for their actions. Everything in life come with rules and someone has to enforce said rules. When athletes show utter disregard for the authority of the rule enforcers on the court, and then show the same tendencies off it, well lets just say it makes some of us fans wonder if it is the rules or the players. They are being paid very well to play a game (every childs dream at some point) that we the fans pay to go see. Show some professionalism and respect for yourselves and us.

I say let the emotion flow while showing respect for the games past and for its future.

Keep up the great work, Mr. Mad Dog, and I can't wait to see your hard work and emotion helping our Timberwolves on to victory.
11/10/2006 3:15:44 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Maddog,

Just discovered this. Good stuff. I'm from the Bay Area and miss seeing you at Maples. Your desire was something I really enjoyed watching.

I disagree with the complaining rules. Players need to realize that complaining is not a part of the game. Refs, like players, make mistakes. Accept it and move on.

Sam Cassell? I know he was your teammate but it is really tiresome watching him complain about everything that goes against his team. Tell me that the refs are not tired of it. Maybe its just TV production but he really appears to be complaining nonstop. If he would accept some things, it would seem more level.
11/10/2006 5:19:33 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Hey Mark,
Sorry, but I have to disagree with your take on the new rule. Watch games from the heyday of the NBA, late 80's early 90's, the players played, the refs made the calls. Every whistle didn't lead to theatrical histrionics, which of course nowadays we can see on replay are often proven wrong (the ranting). It isn't about taking the emotions out of the game at all. It is about shutting up the potty-mouthed whiners. (Yes that definitely means KG)

The only thing that would be better is for it to be enforced evenly, so that even guys the league has based its marketing campaigns around have to shut up and play
jack
11/11/2006 3:31:41 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Hey Mark,

As per your stand on the no-tolerance foul calls and the debate over emotional player reactions... I just attended the Laker/Timberwolves game and I have to say, the heightened emotion was the greatest part of the whole spectacle of talent, extreme skills, constant energy and motion. It seriously was like an adrenline shot! So if these emotional, powerhouse players are stopped everytime they so much as blink at a hint of a foul, that kind of constantly stops the great majestic sweep of emotion that is basketball. I am not talking about a lawless court here. Of course, there are rules, many, many important and complicated rules. And I don't think that refs should have to fear for their lives on court. But didn't these guys become refs to sort of enter into something akin to "the last great frontier"? I mean, this a world of super-intense men, playing it out to the hard-won, gladiator-type finish. We ordinary folk pay our hard-earned cxash to see extreme players doing extremely difficult feats at close range. Sure, an NBA player being an example of character to small children across America is a worthy thing. Most of these guys are off doing many charities and basketball camps in their free time. But when these guys are on the court, they're not Care Bears, they're warriors. The Herculian effort that it takes to blast past a wall of men, many towering over 7 feet tall, to try to finally get the ball flying past all obstacles and safely into the basket, well, that would stress out any normal person. I'd like to see any normal person stay calm, cool, and collected when they attempted this over and over again, only to be completely derailed a majority of the time, and sometimes unjustly so. Most people would eventually freak out. So how can we expect hightly emotional athletes to sat calm as a summer's day in the same situation? Please people, expect fair rules, but don't try to make NBA players into Care Bears. It may just be me, but I don't want to go to a game where players pause after every play and have a cuddly group hug with the ref or the opposing team. Where's the sport in that?
11/12/2006 1:01:57 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Keep up the good work, Mark. I love reading your updates. I was a big fan of yours when you played for the Lakers, and still keep tabs on your career doings.
11/14/2006 9:02:22 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Mark,

It was great to watch you in the game tonight. Looked like you were havin a blast.

John
11/16/2006 4:08:44 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Great insight on the some of the tech issues and the new ball. I wish we had more of that especially from the top players.

it would be awesome for the fans, ideally it could be something similar to the Golf Channel, you could probably be the host...

one thing i would like to comment on, what makes the NBA great is simple, there isn't all this red tape when it comes to changing the dynamics of the game. This started back when all of sudden teams could play the modified zone defense. The NBA is a forward thinking and progressive league where rules can be changed without much thought to consequences. That sometimes has a negative effect on the game, but on the same token, the intentions and purpose of these changes is to make the game more attractive especially at the global level. Hopefully the league can work together with the players on some of these new issues so that everyone can be happy. Personally I don't miss seeing the likes of a Sam Cassell yappin his mouth off to the ref and other players, T him up all they want.

Question for you Mark, is trash talking still okay in the game with the new rules?
11/26/2006 7:28:22 PM (Central Standard Time, UTC-06:00)
Hi Mark,

I agree with your opinion on the zero-tolerance rule, but I can also see why there's a need for that rule. Maybe there could be a middle-ground "one-strike" policy. I don't think I've ever seen a ref's call overturned, just because the game flow gets hurt if you have to sit and convene several opinions, but I haven't seen as much basketball as others, so I can't speak generally.

The stats analysis for the new ball would be an interesting, if very variable project. (I'm still an undergrad at Stanford, btw!) I think there are a lot of variables involved in games like basketball and football compared to baseball, where situations are easily categorized. Each year brings new players and new dynamics to each team, much less to say of any new strategic nuances introduced by the coaching staff, or any improvements in player skill (we could take the veterans, who have hit most of their learning curve already, I suppose). It could be doable, but there are a lot of factors to account for, unless you're watching each turnover and qualifying each as either situationally-induced or ball-induced.
Sam
9/24/2008 1:38:27 AM (Central Daylight Time, UTC-05:00)
horse racing systems
Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):